The French branch of Swedish retailing giant Ikea goes on trial Monday accused of running an elaborate system to spy on staff and job applicants using private detectives and police officers, reports FRANCE 24.
Ikea France, as a corporate entity, will be in the dock as well as several of its former executives who risk prison terms.
French investigative publications Le Canard Enchaîné and Mediapart uncovered the surveillance scheme in 2012, and prosecutors got on the case after the Force Ouvrière union lodged a legal complaint.
Prosecutors say Ikea France set up a "spying system" across its operations across the country, collecting information about the private lives of hundreds of staff and prospective staff, including confidential information about criminal records.
Since the media revelations broke the company has sacked four executives, but Ikea France, which employs 10,000 people, still faces a fine of up to 3.75 million euros ($4.5 million).
The 15 people also appearing before the court in Versailles near Paris include former store managers and top executives such as former CEO Stefan Vanoverbeke and his predecessor, Jean-Louis Baillot.
The group also includes four police officers accused of handing over confidential information.
The charges include illegal gathering of personal information, receiving illegally gathered personal information, and violating professional confidentiality, some of which carry a maximum prison term of ten years.
At the heart of the system is Jean-François Paris, Ikea France's former director of risk management.
Prosectors say he regularly sent lists of names to be investigated to private investigators, whose combined annual bill could run up to 600,000 euros, according to court documents seen by AFP.
The court is investigating Ikea's practices between 2009 and 2012, but prosecutors say they started nearly a decade earlier.
Among their targets was a staff member in Bordeaux "who used to be a model employee, but has suddenly become a protester", according to an email sent by Paris. "We want to know how that change happened," he said, wondering whether there might be "a risk of eco-terrorism".