Discreet and wealthy, the Franco-Japanese Fondation Sasakawa benefits from the support of some members of France's academic and cultural elite. A recent French court ruling, however, has brought to the fore the murky history of Ryoichi Sasakawa, after whom the foundation is named.
The Foundation found itself under an unwanted spotlight at the end of 2008 when a petition was sent to the French foreign ministry appealing that it withdraw from a colloquium co-sponsored by the Foundation. Signed by over 50 French academics, the petition (available, in French only, by clicking here) claimed that the Foundation bears the name of a Class A war criminal, Ryoichi Sasakawa. After World War II Class A criminals were tried in Nuremberg or Tokyo for their key role in the war. In addition, the petition said, Sasakawa was a historical figure of the Japanese far-right, close to the Japanese underworld.
On September 22nd, 2010, a Paris court dismissed the suit and ordered the Foundation to pay all court fees as well as awarding 5,000 euros to Ms. Postel-Vinay. Yet, on the day of the ruling, the Foundation issued a press release expressing its "delight" because the court recognized that "the accusations made against the Foundation were libellous." The press release makes no mention of the court's dismissal of the suit. In an odd choice of words, the Foundation said it "deplored" the legal action it was "submitted" to, despite the fact that it was the Foundation itself that originally filed the suit.
For Ms Postel-Vinay's lawyer, Lorenzo Valentin, "they are leaning on the complexities of libel law". The ruling recognized that some of the language in the petition "undermines the honour or the consideration due" to the Foundation. Two of the paragraphs - out of five - of the petition were considered to be libellous by the judge. But the ruling also states that Ms Postel-Vinay acted in good faith and "legitimately made use of her freedom of expression". Thus the suit was dismissed because libel was not found under French law.
CLAI, a consulting firm specialising in corporate communication, handles public relations for the Foundation. Its president Eric Giuily defended the Foundation's press release. "When the court mentions libellous statements, it means these are unfounded, unproven. Ms Postel-Vinay is not cleared of all accusations," he said. But for Lorenzo Valentin, "the libellous nature of the statement that Ryoichi Sasakawa is a war criminal was not at issue in this suit. The question was: is it legitimate to say so? Were we right to do so? To that question, the court clearly responded, 'yes'." For some, Clai and the Foundation are playing with words and are deliberately muddying a very clear legal decision.
- SocGen faces 2.2 bln tax break refund over its responsibility in 'rogue trader' losses
- India eyes China with bargain deal for French jets
- A sleepy French village torn apart by a centre for migrants
- Revealed: the hidden report on lavish perks paid to former French presidents
- The opportunist 'feminism' of the French Right
- A Paris, les morts de la pollution se comptent par milliers
- Triskalia: indemnisation historique de deux salariés victimes de pesticides
- Notre-Dame-des-Landes: peu à peu, l’Etat prépare l’évacuation
- «EDF s’enferre dans un modèle dépassé et inadapté»
- How biggest polluters earn most from EU farm subsidies
In the Club
Today's French Edition
La UneNathalie Mistral: mes quinze ans de combats chez les guérilleros des Farc
- Se disant victime de violences policières, un enseignant de Paris-1 porte plainte
- Au tribunal, plongée dans la fortune cachée des Wildenstein
- Plus de 50 000 chômeurs supplémentaires au mois d’août
- L'affaire de la «chemise d'Air France»: enfin le procès
- Premier bilan pour les «tables de quartier» citoyennes
- Monsieur le président, des enfants réfugiés meurent à Calais!
- Un frère et une sœur syriens bloqués en France malgré leur droit
- Hollande veut vider «définitivement» la «jungle»
- MediaPorte: «Macron et ron, petit patapon»