A French court has rejected claims that police identity checks on 13 people from minority groups were racist, saying officers didn't overstep any legal boundaries, reports the Boston Herald.
The decision upended an unusual bid to rein in law enforcement officers often accused of racial profiling. The verdict followed a one-day trial in July billed as the first of its kind in France, and a sign that long-silent minorities are increasingly finding their voice. Lawyers for the plaintiffs pledged to appeal — up to the European Court of Human Rights if need be.
The French ruling comes amid a public furor over stop and frisk policies of the New York Police Department. But in that case, being closely watched here, a judge has ruled against NYPD practices said to discriminate against blacks and Hispanics.
Anti-racism groups say that non-white French — particularly blacks or those of Arab origin — face routine discrimination that diminishes their chances of finding jobs, getting into nightclubs and carving out a place for themselves in mainstream society.
Such discrimination, they contend, also subjects minorities to humiliating public identity checks.
The plaintiffs — who range from students to delivery personnel — sought 10,000 euros ($13,000) each in the case. Their lawyers also wanted changes in the law that would require police to provide written reports of ID checks and spell out "objective grounds" for conducting the checks.
"The most obvious consequence (of the decision) is that police in this country... have the right to discriminate," lawyer Slim Ben Achour said afterward. "There is a blank check for police to continue these practices."
The court upheld the state's argument that the ID checks aren't illegal under French law.
Read more of this AP report published by the Boston Herald.