Why France is backtracking on free trade deal with US


The French government was initially enthusiastic about the free trade agreement being negotiated between the European Union and the United States. However in recent months Paris, and in particular overseas trade minister Matthias Fekl, has taken a tougher line on the so-called TAFTA deal. Talks on the agreement resume in New York on Monday April 25th, while the day before President Barack Obama will raise the issue with German chancellor Angela Merkel in Berlin. But as Ludovic Lamant reports, the chances of a deal being struck before the end of Obama's term of office look increasingly remote.

This article is freely available. Check out our subscription offers. Subscribe

On Monday April 25th the 13th round of talks over a free trade agreement between the European Union and the United States gets under way in New York. Discussions between the two sides look set to be difficult. The EU's trade commissioner Cecilia Malmström believes that it is still “possible” to find an agreement between now and the end of the year. But not too many other people share that view.

On Sunday, the day before the talks start, US president Barack Obama will be meeting the German Chancellor Angela Merkel in Hanover when it is likely he will seek to breathe new life into the talks in a bid to enable a deal to be struck before the end of his term of office. But one obstacle to a quick deal now appears to be France's new tough stance on it. For the French overseas trade minister Matthias Fekl, whose remit covers the trade talks, has been warning increasingly that Paris may not accept the treaty, a treaty which worries many in Europe on both the Left and Right. Here Mediapart's Brussels correspondent Ludovic Lamant examines the evolving French reaction to the planned Trans-Atlantic Free Trade Agreement (TAFTA), also known as the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)


  • 1. Matthias Fekl: anti-TAFTA mood music for nearly a year

It is by no means the first time that France's overseas trade minister Matthias Fekl has spoken out on the subject. He attracted headlines at the start of the French regional election campaign late in 2015, first of all in Sud Ouest newspaper then on BFMTV, when he threatened to block the talks. “France is considering all the options, including simply stopping the negotiations,” he said. At the time he said he would take his decision next year – meaning 2016.

The junior minister's tone has hardened in the past week, however, as he revealed that he believed “less and less” in the possibility of an agreement. Reacting to suggestions that Berlin wants to accelerate talks, Fekl said: “If there should be a sudden acceleration that would mean that the hard parts of the negotiations had not been dealt with. That would be a third-rate deal that would not satisfy European demands. For France, a quick deal is a bad deal, we won't sign.” To make sure there was no misunderstanding about what he was saying the minister added: “For the negotiations to make sense they must allow very high standards to be set. But that's not the direction they're taking today. So as I've already said, we must draw the consequences of that.”

In essence the minister criticises the continuing lack of transparency in the negotiations. He considers that thus far Washington has made very few concessions in those areas where France has a clear advantage. Among the key issues for Paris is the degree to which US public markets are opened to European investors: “commercial reciprocity” as it is known in the jargon. “All the American overtures in this area are incidental. Now, it's reasonable to suppose that there will not be advances from the Americans on this issue. That greatly reduces the usefulness of these negotiations,” says Fekl. Another sticking point is that the Americans seem to object to recognising a whole raft of “geographical indications” (GIs) that are supposed to protect certain agricultural products in France and elsewhere.

  • 2. A novelty: Hollande and Valls on the same page

Since he became a minister in September 2014, Matthias Fekl has chalked up a few political successes in relation to the TAFTA talks. In particular he distinguished himself over the renegotiations concerning the deeply controversial court that is part of the TAFTA structure, an investment court that is supposed to allow multinationals to take legal action against nation states. His line, agreed with Berlin, was able to change the European Commission's stance on the issue. But Fekl has had a major handicap during the talks: it has often been hard to know whether the French president's office and that of the prime minister were on the same wavelength. For a long while this left the minister on his own in the talks.

In particular there were the devastating comments made by President François Hollande during a trip to the United States at the beginning of 2014, when he said the ongoing trade talks had to be speeded up – the opposite of the current line. “Going faster is not a problem, it's a solution,” said Hollande. “We have everything to gain by going fast. Otherwise, as we well know, there'll be a build-up of fear, threats and tensions,” said the French president.

It will also be recalled how, in the spring of 2013, the French president was happy with a bare minimum from the treaty when the EU heads of state and government drew up the mandate for the European Commission ahead of its negotiations with Washington. At the time the debate came down to one single demand: to exclude audiovisual services from the scope of the negotiations. This demand was obtained, but it was the only point that Paris had found to pick up on in the Commission mandate, even though it contained, among others things, the thorny issue of the investor court that was to paralyse a major part of the negotiations from the summer of 2014.

From this perspective, François Hollande's comments during his television appearance on public broadcaster France 2 on April 14th must have relieved Fekl, who saw his strategy confirmed by the head of state. Hollande was seeking to show proof of his firmness on a subject, the trans-Atlantic trade deal, which taps into the unease of a section of the French population about globalisation. “France has laid down its conditions, France has said that if there is no reciprocity, if there is no transparency, if there's a danger for the farmers, if we don't have access to the public markets and if, on the other hand, The Unites States can have access to everything that we do here, I won't accept it,” he said.

With France's 2017 presidential election looming, and with the far-right Front National and the radical left Parti de Gauche, among others, likely to make the treaty an electoral issue, the French president doubtless had little choice but to talk in that way. Prime minister Manuel Valls, speaking on France Info radio on Wednesday April 20th, reiterated the French line, expressing his “concern” about the direction that the negotiations have taken.

Extend your reading on Mediapart Unlimited access to the Journal free contribution in the Club Subscribe