Indian defence minister dismisses Mediapart report


Speaking at a press briefing in Paris on Thurday, Indian defence minister Nirmala Sitharaman reiterated her government's claim that did not impose an Indian company run by a businessman close to Prime Minister Narendra Modi as local industrial partner for Dassault Aviation in the sale to New Delhi of 36 Rafale fighter planes, despite new evidence published by Mediapart suggesting that was the case.

This article is open access. Information protects us. I subscribe

India's defence minister faced new questions Thursday over a 2016 deal to buy Rafale fighter jets from France, which critics say unfairly profited a key backer of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, reports The Economic Times.

Speaking at a briefing in Paris, Nirmala Sitharaman reiterated the government's claim that it had no idea the jets' builder, Dassault Aviation, would team up with Reliance Group, run by Anil Ambani.

Several reports say Dassault was forced to choose Reliance by Modi, despite its having almost no experience in the aviation sector.

On the eve of Sitharaman's visit French investigative website Mediapart quoted the notes of a meeting between Dassault management and workers' representatives which described the choice of Reliance as "imperative and compulsory".

"We are very clear: With the government of France, we agreed to purchase 36 Rafale aircraft in flyaway condition," Sitharaman said.

"And in an intergovernmental agreement, there are no mentions of any individual firms," she said.

Pressed on whether India would go ahead with the deal amid a chorus of "crony capitalism" claims and complaints filed by Indian anti-corruption groups, the minister adopted a more combative tone.

"It is more for the companies which have chosen A, B or C as their partners to answer questions if there are any," she said.

Dassault on Wednesday contested the Mediapart report, saying it had "freely chosen" to form a joint venture with Reliance.

Read more of this report from The Economic Times.


No mobilization without confidence
No trust without truth
Support us